<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Backup on Pieter Viljoen's Blog</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/category/backup/</link><description>Recent content in Backup on Pieter Viljoen's Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:10:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/category/backup/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Cooling an Overheating NVMe SSD</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2021/03/15/cooling-an-overheating-mvme-ssd/</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:10:50 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2021/03/15/cooling-an-overheating-mvme-ssd/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The SSD in my Windows 10 system started reporting failures, and as luck would have it, died while I was cloning it to a new drive. I suspect death was caused by overheating, and I addressed that with my new setup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This Windows 10 system is in an &lt;a href="https://ncases.com/products/m1"&gt;NCase M1 v5&lt;/a&gt; SFF case with an &lt;a href="https://rog.asus.com/us/motherboards/rog-strix/rog-strix-z390-i-gaming-model/"&gt;ASUS ROG STRIX Z390-I GAMING&lt;/a&gt; mini-ITX motherboard and a &lt;a href="https://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/minisite/ssd/product/consumer/970evo/"&gt;Samsung 970 EVO&lt;/a&gt; NVMe M.2 SSD drive. The motherboard has two M.2 slots, one on the front of the motherboard and one on the back. The slot on the front has a heatsink, but I noticed the drive runs hot even under no load. Some googling showed this to be a common problem with the heatsink and M.2 slot being heated by the motherboard chipset, so I moved the SSD to the slot on the back of the motherboard. The SSD still reported +60°C temperatures under load, and I added a passive &lt;a href="https://amzn.to/3rMKAB3"&gt;heatsink&lt;/a&gt;, and that kept temperatures in the low 50°C&amp;rsquo;s even under load.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>CrashPlan throws in the towel ... for home users</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2017/08/22/crashplan-throws-in-the-towel-for-home-users/</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 01:19:55 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2017/08/22/crashplan-throws-in-the-towel-for-home-users/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today &lt;a href="https://www.crashplan.com/en-us/"&gt;CrashPlan&lt;/a&gt;, my current online backup provider, announced on &lt;a href="https://www.facebook.com/CrashPlan/"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; of all places, that they threw in the towel, and will no longer provide service to home users. The backlash was heated, and I found the CEO&amp;rsquo;s video message on the &lt;a href="https://blog.code42.com/data-protection-needs-diverge/"&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; rather condescending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been a &lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/category/backup/"&gt;long time&lt;/a&gt; user of online backup providers, and many have &lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/04/12/unlimited-online-backup-providers/"&gt;thrown in the towel&lt;/a&gt;, especially when free file sync from Google and Microsoft offers ever expanding capabilities and more and more free storage. Eventually even the cheapest backup storage implementation becomes expensive, when compared to a cloud provider, and not profitable as a primary business.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>CrashPlan Memory Utilization</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2012/07/15/crashplan-memory-utilization/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:39:14 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2012/07/15/crashplan-memory-utilization/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been using &lt;a href="http://www.crashplan.com/"&gt;CrashPlan&lt;/a&gt; as an online backup solution for quite some time, and it works really well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like the fact that I can subscribe to the consumer plan, with almost 3.5TB of data backed up, and that the backup client installs on a server OS. Many of the other &amp;ldquo;unlimited&amp;rdquo; backup providers I tested have restrictions in place that make such a setup impossible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CrashPlan sends email notifications about backup status, and I noticed that something was wrong with the backup:
&lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/media/2012/07/crashplan-email_.png"&gt;&lt;img alt="CrashPlan.Email" loading="lazy" src="https://blog.insanegenius.com/media/2012/07/crashplan-email_thumb.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Unlimited online backup providers becoming extinct</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/04/12/unlimited-online-backup-providers/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 04:53:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/04/12/unlimited-online-backup-providers/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I just received an email from &lt;a href="http://www.elephantdrive.com/"&gt;ElephantDrive&lt;/a&gt; informing me that my legacy unlimited storage account will be terminated in 30 days, and that I must select a new plan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In July 2009 &lt;a href="http://www.elephantdrive.com/"&gt;ElephantDrive&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://support.elephantdrive.com/entries/211796-why-did-elephantdrive-change-their-plans"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; that they are no longer offering their $100 per year unlimited storage plan. ElephantDrive is now offering a &lt;a href="https://www.elephantdrive.com/welcome/home_plans.aspx"&gt;$200 per year for 500GB&lt;/a&gt; plan.&lt;br&gt;
In February 2011 &lt;a href="http://mozy.com/"&gt;Mozy&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://mozy.com/support/mozyhome?utm_source=newsletter&amp;amp;utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_content=MillinerLaunch-WayOver&amp;amp;utm_campaign=SpecialAnnouncements&amp;amp;ref=36b792db"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; that they are no longer offering their $55 per year unlimited storage plan. Mozy is now offering a &lt;a href="http://mozy.com/home/pricing/"&gt;$120 per year for 125GB&lt;/a&gt; plan.&lt;br&gt;
In February 2011 &lt;a href="http://us.trendmicro.com/us/products/personal/safe-sync/"&gt;Trend Micro SafeSync&lt;/a&gt; announced that they are &lt;a href="http://esupport.trendmicro.com/pages/Frequently-Asked-Questions-FAQ-about-Rate-Limiting-in-Trend-Micro-SafeSync.aspx"&gt;bandwidth throttling&lt;/a&gt; large accounts. In March 2011 they announced that they are no longer offering their $35 per year unlimited storage plan. SafeSync is now offering a &lt;a href="http://us.trendmicro.com/us/products/personal/safe-sync/"&gt;$150 per year for 150GB&lt;/a&gt; plan.&lt;br&gt;
Carbonite offers a &lt;a href="https://buy.carbonite.com/buy/index/4486"&gt;$55 per year for unlimited storage&lt;/a&gt; plan, but they are &lt;a href="http://carbonite.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/1440"&gt;bandwidth throttling&lt;/a&gt; accounts over 35GB to 512Kbps and accounts over 200GB to 100Kbps access speeds.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.avg.com/us-en/avg-livekive"&gt;AVG LiveKive&lt;/a&gt; offers an &lt;a href="http://www.avg.com/us-en/avg-livekive"&gt;$80 per year for unlimited storage&lt;/a&gt; plan, but the &lt;a href="http://www.avg.com/us-en/livekive-terms"&gt;terms of service&lt;/a&gt; defines unlimited as 500GB.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.backblaze.com/"&gt;BackBlaze&lt;/a&gt; offers a &lt;a href="http://www.backblaze.com/"&gt;$60 per year for unlimited storage&lt;/a&gt; plan.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.crashplan.com/"&gt;CrashPlan&lt;/a&gt; offers a &lt;a href="http://www.crashplan.com/consumer/store.vtl"&gt;$50 per year for unlimited storage&lt;/a&gt; plan.&lt;br&gt;
Neither &lt;a href="http://www.backblaze.com/"&gt;BackBlaze&lt;/a&gt;nor &lt;a href="http://www.crashplan.com/"&gt;CrashPlan&lt;/a&gt; supports their unlimited plan on server class machines.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Trend Micro SafeSync, neat, but unreliable</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2010/12/31/trend-micro-safesync-neat-but-unreliable/</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 22:17:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2010/12/31/trend-micro-safesync-neat-but-unreliable/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I wanted to write about &lt;a href="http://us.trendmicro.com/us/products/personal/safe-sync/"&gt;Trend Micro SafeSync&lt;/a&gt;, but it reminded me of my &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streamload"&gt;Streamload&lt;/a&gt; experience, and I ended up writing &lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/2010/12/will-your-online-backup-or-sync-and.html"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; instead. This time I am really going to write about SafeSync.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SafeSync is another online backup and sync and share application. Actually, they offer both online storage through a mapped drive, and syncing folders online, this makes it unique compared to many existing offerings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have used almost all online backup and sync and share type applications out there, my favorite remains &lt;a href="http://www.dropbox.com/"&gt;DropBox&lt;/a&gt;. SafeSync used to be &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humyo"&gt;Humyo&lt;/a&gt;, before being acquired by Trend. I used Humyo when they were in Beta, it was just ok, but between then and now their product seems to have come a long way.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Will your online backup or sync and share provider survive?</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2010/12/31/will-your-online-backup-or-sync-and-share-provider-survive/</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2010/12/31/will-your-online-backup-or-sync-and-share-provider-survive/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been using online backup for many years. I won&amp;rsquo;t call myself an expert, experienced maybe, but I have tried almost all online backup and sync and share services. My biggest concern is still the longevity and trustworthiness of the provider.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My biggest disappointment is definitely &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streamload"&gt;Streamload&lt;/a&gt;. Streamload was a great service, they provided unlimited storage, had a client up-loader, supported FTP access, and had a great web frontend. And this was in 2005, long before many other online storage providers existed, and nobody else offered unlimited storage. The concept was great, take any of your online files, and present them in a web friendly way, e.g. play your backed up music collection from your browser, watch your backed up movies from your browser.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>