<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Datarobotics on Pieter Viljoen's Blog</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/tag/datarobotics/</link><description>Recent content in Datarobotics on Pieter Viljoen's Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 07:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/tag/datarobotics/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Data Robotics DroboPro vs. QNAP TS-859 Pro</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2010/01/30/data-robotics-drobopro-vs-qnap-ts-859-pro/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2010/01/30/data-robotics-drobopro-vs-qnap-ts-859-pro/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I previously wrote about my &lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/2009/12/drobopro-impressions.html" title="impressions of the DroboPro"&gt;impressions of the DroboPro&lt;/a&gt;, and in case I was not clear, I was not impressed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I recently read the announcement of the new &lt;a href="http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=146" title="QNAP TS-859 Pro"&gt;QNAP TS-859 Pro&lt;/a&gt;, and from the literature it seemed like a great device, high performance, feature rich, and power saving.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The TS-859 Pro is now available, and I compared it with the DroboPro, and against a regular W2K8R2 file server.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>