<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Dxo on Pieter Viljoen's Blog</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/tag/dxo/</link><description>Recent content in Dxo on Pieter Viljoen's Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/tag/dxo/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>DxO Optics Pro and Adobe Lightroom on Vista x64</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2009/02/11/dxo-optics-pro-and-adobe-lightroom-on-vista-x64/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2009/02/11/dxo-optics-pro-and-adobe-lightroom-on-vista-x64/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I bought my first SLR camera, a Canon EOS 20D, and my first wide angle lens, a Canon EF-S 10-22, several years ago. Amongst the many articles and reviews I read, online and in magazines, I came across a product called &lt;a href="http://www.dxo.com/us/photo/dxo_optics_pro"&gt;DxO Optics Pro&lt;/a&gt;, a product that would supposedly correct, amongst other things, lens distortion. This seemed like the perfect tool to help me with my wide angle pictures that looked very &amp;ldquo;fishy eyed&amp;rdquo;. And since DxO, then version 4, was receiving good reviews, I decided to trial the product. In those days the DxO licensing model was to pay per camera body and per lens module, not a cheap investment, but I really liked the results and so I purchased the product.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>