<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Qnap on Pieter Viljoen's Blog</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/tag/qnap/</link><description>Recent content in Qnap on Pieter Viljoen's Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/tag/qnap/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Synology DS2411+ Performance Review</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/07/21/synology-ds2411-performance-review/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/07/21/synology-ds2411-performance-review/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In my &lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/07/synology-ds1511-vs-qnap-ts-859-pro.html"&gt;last post&lt;/a&gt; I compared the performance of &lt;a href="http://www.synology.com/us/products/DS1511+/index.php"&gt;Synology DS1511+&lt;/a&gt; against the &lt;a href="http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=146"&gt;QNAP TS-859 Pro&lt;/a&gt;. As I finished writing that post, Synology announced the new &lt;a href="http://www.synology.com/us/products/DS2411+/index.php"&gt;Synology DS2411+&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
Instead of using a DS1511+ and DX510 extender for 10 disks, the DS2411+ offers 12 disks in a single device. The price difference is also marginal, &lt;a href="http://amzn.to/KnkD02"&gt;DS1511+ is $836&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href="http://amzn.to/Mm0IkU"&gt;DX510 is $500&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href="http://amzn.to/JS31rA"&gt;DS2411+ is $1700&lt;/a&gt;. That is a difference of only $364, and well worth it for the extra storage space, and the reliability and stability of all drives in one enclosure. I ended up returning my DX510 and DS1511+, and got a DS2411+ instead.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Synology DS1511+ vs. QNAP TS-859 Pro, iSCSI MPIO Performance</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/07/06/synology-ds1511-vs-qnap-ts-859-pro-iscsi-mpio-performance/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/07/06/synology-ds1511-vs-qnap-ts-859-pro-iscsi-mpio-performance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been very happy with my &lt;a href="http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=146"&gt;QNAP TS-859 Pro&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href="http://amzn.to/Lpv6Yr"&gt;Amazon&lt;/a&gt;), but I&amp;rsquo;ve run out of space while archiving my media collection, and I needed to expand the storage capacity. You can read about my experience with the TS-859 Pro &lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/2010/01/data-robotics-drobopro-vs-qnap-ts-859.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and my experience archiving my media collection &lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/04/archiving-my-cd-dvd-and-bd-collection.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
My primary objective with this project is storage capacity expansion, and my secondary objective is improved performance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My choices for storage capacity expansion included:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Data Robotics DroboPro vs. QNAP TS-859 Pro</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2010/01/30/data-robotics-drobopro-vs-qnap-ts-859-pro/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2010/01/30/data-robotics-drobopro-vs-qnap-ts-859-pro/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I previously wrote about my &lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/2009/12/drobopro-impressions.html" title="impressions of the DroboPro"&gt;impressions of the DroboPro&lt;/a&gt;, and in case I was not clear, I was not impressed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I recently read the announcement of the new &lt;a href="http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=146" title="QNAP TS-859 Pro"&gt;QNAP TS-859 Pro&lt;/a&gt;, and from the literature it seemed like a great device, high performance, feature rich, and power saving.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The TS-859 Pro is now available, and I compared it with the DroboPro, and against a regular W2K8R2 file server.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>