<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Synology on Pieter Viljoen's Blog</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/tag/synology/</link><description>Recent content in Synology on Pieter Viljoen's Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 22:54:46 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/tag/synology/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Storage Spaces Leaves Me Empty</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2012/09/22/storage-spaces-leaves-me-empty/</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 22:54:46 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2012/09/22/storage-spaces-leaves-me-empty/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was very intrigued when I found out about Storage Spaces and ReFS being introduced in Windows Server 2012 and Windows 8. But now that I&amp;rsquo;ve spent some time with it, I&amp;rsquo;m left disappointed, and I will not be trusting my precious data with either of these features, just yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft publicly announced &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/01/05/virtualizing-storage-for-scale-resiliency-and-efficiency.aspx"&gt;Storage Spaces&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/01/16/building-the-next-generation-file-system-for-windows-refs.aspx"&gt;ReFS&lt;/a&gt; in early Windows 8 blog posts. Storage Spaces was of special interest to the Windows Home Server community in light of Microsoft first &lt;a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/windows/b/windowshomeserver/archive/2010/11/23/windows-home-server-code-name-vail-update.aspx"&gt;dropping support&lt;/a&gt; for Drive Extender in Windows Home Server 2011, and then completely dropping Windows Home Server, and replacing it with &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/"&gt;Windows Server 2012 Essentials&lt;/a&gt;. My personal interest was more geared towards expanding my home storage capacity in a cost effective and energy efficient way, without tying myself to proprietary hardware solutions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Synology DS2411+ Performance Review</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/07/21/synology-ds2411-performance-review/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/07/21/synology-ds2411-performance-review/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In my &lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/07/synology-ds1511-vs-qnap-ts-859-pro.html"&gt;last post&lt;/a&gt; I compared the performance of &lt;a href="http://www.synology.com/us/products/DS1511+/index.php"&gt;Synology DS1511+&lt;/a&gt; against the &lt;a href="http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=146"&gt;QNAP TS-859 Pro&lt;/a&gt;. As I finished writing that post, Synology announced the new &lt;a href="http://www.synology.com/us/products/DS2411+/index.php"&gt;Synology DS2411+&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
Instead of using a DS1511+ and DX510 extender for 10 disks, the DS2411+ offers 12 disks in a single device. The price difference is also marginal, &lt;a href="http://amzn.to/KnkD02"&gt;DS1511+ is $836&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href="http://amzn.to/Mm0IkU"&gt;DX510 is $500&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href="http://amzn.to/JS31rA"&gt;DS2411+ is $1700&lt;/a&gt;. That is a difference of only $364, and well worth it for the extra storage space, and the reliability and stability of all drives in one enclosure. I ended up returning my DX510 and DS1511+, and got a DS2411+ instead.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Synology DS1511+ vs. QNAP TS-859 Pro, iSCSI MPIO Performance</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/07/06/synology-ds1511-vs-qnap-ts-859-pro-iscsi-mpio-performance/</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/07/06/synology-ds1511-vs-qnap-ts-859-pro-iscsi-mpio-performance/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been very happy with my &lt;a href="http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=146"&gt;QNAP TS-859 Pro&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href="http://amzn.to/Lpv6Yr"&gt;Amazon&lt;/a&gt;), but I&amp;rsquo;ve run out of space while archiving my media collection, and I needed to expand the storage capacity. You can read about my experience with the TS-859 Pro &lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/2010/01/data-robotics-drobopro-vs-qnap-ts-859.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and my experience archiving my media collection &lt;a href="https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/04/archiving-my-cd-dvd-and-bd-collection.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
My primary objective with this project is storage capacity expansion, and my secondary objective is improved performance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My choices for storage capacity expansion included:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Archiving my CD, DVD and BD collection</title><link>https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/04/22/archiving-my-cd-dvd-and-bd-collection/</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.insanegenius.com/2011/04/22/archiving-my-cd-dvd-and-bd-collection/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I am about two thirds done archiving my entire CD, DVD, and BD collection to network storage. I have been ripping on a part time basis for about 5 months, and so far I&amp;rsquo;ve ripped over 700 discs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have considered archiving my media collection for some time, but just never got around to it. Recently our toddler discovered how to open discs and use them as toys, so storing the discs safely quickly became a priority. I&amp;rsquo;d like to give you some insight into what I&amp;rsquo;ve learned and what process I follow.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>